What Google Flow costs
| Plan | Price | Google Flow credits | Credits per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| No subscription | $0 | 50 per day | About 1,500 if used daily |
| Google AI Plus | $4.99/mo | 200 per month | 200 |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99/mo | 1,000 per month | 1,000 |
| Google AI Ultra $100 | $99.99/mo | 10,000 per month | 10,000 |
| Google AI Ultra $200 | $199.99/mo | 25,000 per month | 25,000 |
Read from labs.google/fx/tools/flow and confirmed against Google’s own help article on managing Flow credits, 24 August 2026. Google prints an asterisk on that page reading “Prices may vary by market”, so treat these as US figures.
The free tier out-earns the first two paid plans
That table contains a number that should not be possible. The free tier refreshes 50 credits every day. Google AI Plus, at $4.99 a month, hands you 200 credits and then stops.
Four days of free use exceeds a month of Plus. Used daily for a month, the free tier is worth about 1,500 credits, which is seven and a half times what Plus gives you and fifty per cent more than Pro at $19.99.
We checked this twice because it reads like an error. It is not. Google’s help documentation states it plainly: all users who are not Plus, Pro or Ultra subscribers receive 50 Google Flow credits per day free of charge.
The four catches, and one of them is serious
A free tier that beats two paid tiers has conditions attached. Google publishes all of them, which is more than most vendors in this category manage.
Credits do not roll over. Unused daily credits are gone at the next refresh. You cannot bank three weeks of free credits and spend them on a big project on a Friday. The ceiling is 50 a day, permanently.
The refresh is triggered by use, not by the clock. Google’s documentation gives the example: if you first spend credits on 12 August, your next 50 arrive on 13 August. It is a rolling day from your own first generation, not a calendar reset.
Free credits only work on three models. Veo 3.1 Lite, Fast and Quality. Nothing else. Gemini Omni Flash, which handles 10 second clips and video editing, is closed to free users.
Upgrading forfeits your balance immediately. If you subscribe partway through a day, remaining free credits are wiped and replaced by the plan allocation. On Plus that means you can hand over $4.99 and end up with fewer credits than you had a minute earlier.
What a generation actually costs
Google publishes a per generation credit table, which puts it ahead of Kling and Vidu, neither of which publishes one at all. These are costs per generation, not per request, and Google notes that one request can produce two videos.
| Model | Lengths | Credits, non-Ultra | Credits, Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Lite | 4s, 6s, 8s, extend | 10 | 5 |
| Veo 3.1 Fast | 4s, 6s, 8s, extend | 20 | 10 |
| Veo 3.1 Quality | 8s, extend | 100 | 100 |
| Gemini Omni Flash | 4s / 6s / 8s / 10s | 15 / 20 / 25 / 30 | Same |
| Gemini Omni Flash | Edit existing video | 40 | Same |
| Any model | 1080p upscale | 0 for subscribers, unavailable free | 0 |
| Any model | 4K upscale | Unavailable | 50 |
The free tier can never produce a Quality clip
Put the two tables together and something falls out that Google does not spell out anywhere.
Veo 3.1 Quality costs 100 credits for all users. The free daily grant is 50 credits and it does not roll over.
So a free user can never generate a single Veo 3.1 Quality video. Not on day one, not after saving for a week. The model is listed as available to free users, the credits will never reach it, and the two facts sit in different documents.
What the free tier can actually do, per day:
| Model | Cost | Free videos per day | Seconds per day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 Lite | 10 credits | 5 | Up to 40 |
| Veo 3.1 Fast | 20 credits | 2, with 10 credits stranded | Up to 16 |
| Veo 3.1 Quality | 100 credits | 0, ever | 0 |
Lite charges the same 10 credits for a 4 second, 6 second or 8 second clip, so there is never a reason to generate short. Always ask for 8 seconds.
Cost per video, every plan
Divide the plan price by the credits, then multiply by the generation cost. Ultra subscribers get the discount twice over, because their credits are cheaper and Lite and Fast cost them half as many.
| Plan | Per credit | Lite video | Fast video | Quality video |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI Plus | $0.0250 | $0.25 | $0.50 | $2.50 |
| Google AI Pro | $0.0200 | $0.20 | $0.40 | $2.00 |
| Ultra $100 | $0.0100 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $1.00 |
| Ultra $200 | $0.0080 | $0.04 | $0.08 | $0.80 |
And the same figures as monthly output ceilings:
| Plan | Lite videos | Fast videos | Quality videos |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | About 150 | About 60 | 0 |
| Plus $4.99 | 20 | 10 | 2 |
| Pro $19.99 | 100 | 50 | 10 |
| Ultra $100 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 100 |
| Ultra $200 | 5,000 | 2,500 | 250 |
Plus buys you two Quality clips a month. That is the plan’s real proposition: not volume, but access to the model the free tier cannot reach, plus 1080p upscaling at no credit cost.
How this compares on cost per second
Veo 3.1 Lite at 8 seconds for 10 credits is the cheapest second of AI video we have found in this category, by a distance.
| Tool and plan | Cost per second |
|---|---|
| Google Flow, free tier | $0 |
| Google Flow Pro, Veo 3.1 Lite | $0.025 |
| Pika Standard, 480p | $0.034 |
| Pika Standard, 720p | $0.057 |
| Pika Standard, 1080p | $0.114 |
| Runway Max, Gen-4.5 | $0.120 |
| Google Flow Pro, Veo 3.1 Quality | $0.250 |
| Runway Standard, Gen-4.5 | $0.288 |
This compares published cost, not output quality. Veo 3.1 Lite is a lite model and Gen-4.5 is a premium one, so the two ends of that table are not the same product. We have not tested any of these and make no claim about which looks better. What the table shows is that if cost per second is your constraint, Google has priced the floor out from under everyone.
The starkest comparison is at the free end. Runway’s free plan gives 125 one time credits, about ten seconds of Gen-4.5, once, ever. Google’s free tier gives up to 40 seconds a day, indefinitely. In a single day the Google free tier produces roughly four times as much video as Runway’s free plan will produce in its entire life.
Who each plan suits
Free, no subscription. Anyone producing short clips at moderate volume who does not need the Quality model or 1080p upscaling. Five 8 second Lite clips a day, every day, is more free output than any other tool in this category offers, and it is not close.
Plus at $4.99. Only worth it for the Quality model and free 1080p upscaling. It is a downgrade on volume against the free tier, which is a strange thing to write about a paid plan, but the arithmetic is the arithmetic.
Pro at $19.99. The first plan that beats the free tier outright: 1,000 credits, 100 Lite videos or 10 Quality, plus Gemini 3.1 Pro, YouTube Premium Lite and 5 TB of storage bundled in. If you already wanted Google One storage, the video is close to free.
Ultra at $99.99 or $199.99. Where the per video cost collapses, because Lite and Fast cost Ultra subscribers half the credits. A Lite clip costs an Ultra subscriber 4 to 5 cents against 25 cents on Plus. If you are producing at volume, nothing else in this comparison is close.
Where Google Flow sits against the rest
| Tool | Entry paid | Free plan |
|---|---|---|
| Google Flow | $4.99/mo | 50 credits daily, about 5 clips |
| Kling AI | $8.80/mo ongoing | $0 Basic, no credits stated |
| Pika | $10/mo | 80 credits monthly, about 6 clips |
| Vidu | $10/mo | 10 references monthly |
| Runway | $12/mo billed yearly | 125 credits, one time |
| HeyGen | $29/mo | 3 videos monthly |
| Luma AI | $30/mo | None since early 2026 |
Google is both the cheapest paid entry and by a wide margin the most generous free tier. For a full breakdown of every plan across all of these, see AI video generator pricing compared. For the free tiers specifically, see which AI video tools still have a free tier.
How we verified this
We went to labs.google, followed the navigation to Google Flow rather than guessing a URL, and read the pricing section on the page. We then followed Google’s own “see here for breakdown of costs per generation” link from that page’s FAQ into the support documentation, rather than searching for a help article that looked right.
Both the plan credits and the per generation costs come from Google’s own published pages on 24 August 2026. The credit rules, the daily refresh behaviour, the rollover policy and the forfeit on upgrade all come from Google’s help article on managing Flow credits.
Two caveats worth stating. Google prints “Prices may vary by market” on the pricing page, so these are US dollar figures that may not be what you see. And Google states directly that model costs are evolving fast and that the current cost appears in the product settings when you select a model, so a table published today is a snapshot rather than a commitment.
We have not tested Google Flow’s output and make no claim about quality here. This page reports what Google publishes and what that arithmetic implies.
Written by
FazFaz is the founder of AIToolsBakery. Some tools here are tested hands on. Others are assessed from vendor documentation and pricing verified on the live page, and every review says which one it is. Sponsors can buy a position in a guide. They cannot buy the score, the criticism, or silence about a better option.
How we test and how we make money →
