AI Sales Tool Pricing Compared (2026): Four Different Units, One Fake Column

Last updated: August 2026
Of eleven major AI sales tools, seven publish a price and four quote on request. The seven do not share a unit: some charge per seat, some per credit, some per email sent. Any table with one price column is comparing different things. Verified 26 August 2026.


How we researched this

We did not run these eleven products for this page. This is a pricing analysis, read from each vendor’s own pricing page in a browser on 26 August 2026, reached by following that vendor’s own navigation rather than by guessing a URL. It is not a hands-on review and nothing here is scored. Where we have used a tool properly, the vendor section links to that review.

Three method notes matter, because each of them changed an answer on this page.

We record the final URL, not the one we asked for. Outreach.io redirects to outreach.ai. A first pass followed a link labelled “Mutual Action Plans” instead of the pricing link, because the word “plans” matched first. Reading the address bar is what caught it.

A blocked page is unchecked, not empty. ZoomInfo returned HTTP 403 on every path across two passes. A block tells you about the block, not about the page behind it, so until we reached it we recorded ZoomInfo as unchecked and made no claim in either direction. It returned HTTP 200 on the third attempt and only then did it earn a line in the table below.

We read from Mumbai, and prices move with the reader. HubSpot served us its entire pricing page in rupees and offered no US dollar option in its own currency control, so HubSpot’s dollar figures below come from a US-crawled Internet Archive snapshot dated 13 August 2026 and are labelled as such. We have not converted a rupee figure into dollars anywhere, because a converted number is a number HubSpot does not quote.


Seven publish, four do not

Tool Publishes a price Entry price Unit
Salesforce Sales Cloud Yes $25/user/mo Per user
HubSpot Sales Hub Yes $7/seat/mo (13 Aug 2026) Per seat
Apollo.io Yes Free, then $49/seat/mo Per seat plus credits
Clay Yes Free, then $167/mo Two meters, actions and data credits
Smartlead Yes $32/mo Send volume
Instantly Yes $47/mo Send volume
Lavender Yes Free, then $27/mo Per user
Outreach No Quote Seats plus AI credits, model published
Salesloft No Quote Not published
Cognism No Quote Credits, model published in detail
ZoomInfo No Quote Not published

Annual billing where a vendor offers it. Every figure was read on 26 August 2026 except HubSpot, dated above.


The column that cannot exist

Nearly every comparison of these tools you will find puts them in one table with one price column. That column is fiction, because the seven vendors that publish a number are not selling the same thing by the same measure.

There are four units in play.

Per seat. Salesforce, HubSpot and Lavender’s Teams plan charge for people. Your bill tracks headcount and is unaffected by how hard anyone works.

Per credit. Apollo, Clay and Cognism charge for data operations. Your bill tracks how much you enrich, reveal or research, and is unaffected by headcount.

Per email sent. Smartlead and Instantly charge for volume. Your bill tracks sends, and both give you unlimited or near-unlimited mailboxes because mailboxes are not the thing they are selling.

Per revealed contact. Cognism defines a credit precisely as one revealed contact, and charges nothing to look at one you have already revealed.

This is why the cheapest tool in the category depends entirely on which of your numbers is growing. A team that doubles headcount and holds volume flat gets a much larger bill from Salesforce and no change at all from Smartlead. A team that holds headcount and triples its sending gets the reverse.

Faz says: Before you compare a single price, work out which of your three numbers is growing fastest: people, records, or sends. That decides which unit hurts. Everything after that is haggling.

Cost per thousand emails, computed from the vendors’ own figures

Smartlead and Instantly are the two here that sell the same thing in the same unit, so they can be compared directly. Both prices below are monthly billing, and the sends allowance is each vendor’s own published figure.

Plan Price per month Emails per month Cost per 1,000 emails
Instantly Growth $47 5,000 $9.40
Smartlead Base $39 6,000 $6.50
Smartlead Pro $94 90,000 $1.04
Smartlead Unlimited Smart $174 150,000 $1.16
Instantly Hypergrowth $97 125,000 $0.78
Smartlead Unlimited Prime $379 500,000 $0.76
Instantly Light Speed $358 500,000 $0.72

Two things fall out of that table that neither vendor puts in front of you.

The entry tiers are ten times the price per email of the tier above them. Instantly Growth is $9.40 per thousand and Instantly Hypergrowth is $0.78. That is a twelvefold difference for the same product. Smartlead Base is $6.50 and Smartlead Pro is $1.04, a sixfold difference. If you are anywhere near the top of an entry plan’s allowance, the tier above is not an upsell, it is a discount.

Smartlead’s most popular tier is not its cheapest per send. Unlimited Smart is $1.16 per thousand and Pro, one tier below it, is $1.04. Smart is still the better buy for many teams, but for the contact allowance and the free data add-on, not for the sending economics.


The annual discount audit

Four of these vendors advertise a percentage saving for paying annually. All four print both prices on the same page, so all four claims are checkable in about ten seconds. We checked.

Vendor Claims Actually saves Holds up
Smartlead 17% off 16.9% to 17.9% across all four tiers Yes
Clay Save 10% 10% Yes
Apollo.io Save 24% 24.6% on Basic, 20.2% and 20.1% above it On one tier of three
Lavender No percentage claimed 6.9% to 10.1% n/a

Apollo is the one to watch. The badge says “Save 24%” as a flat statement, not “up to 24%”, and it sits above all three paid tiers. It is true on Basic. On Professional you save 20.2%, and for 24% to hold there the annual price would need to be about $75 a month rather than $79.

Smartlead deserves the opposite note. Its 17% claim holds on every single tier, between 16.9% and 17.9%. That is rarer in this category than it should be.


The fees that are not in the headline price

HubSpot requires a one-time onboarding fee on its two upper tiers, and says so in a footnote. Professional carries a required $1,500 Professional Onboarding and Enterprise carries a required $3,500 Enterprise Onboarding, and HubSpot’s own asterisk states that the cost shown does not include it. For a two-seat Professional team, year one is $2,160 in licences plus $1,500, so the onboarding adds 69% to the first year. For a five-seat team it adds 28%. It is the single largest gap between headline and invoice anywhere in this batch.

Apollo’s cheapest team tier cannot be bought as advertised. Organization is listed at $119 per seat per month, but it is annual only and has a three-seat minimum. The real entry cost is $357 a month, or $4,284 for the year.

Clay’s headline price is two meters added together. Launch at $167 a month is $54 for 180,000 actions a year plus $113 for 30,000 data credits a year. Growth at $446 is $185 plus $261. Both add up exactly on Clay’s own page. What that means in practice is that around two thirds of a Launch bill is the data meter, not the actions meter, and the two move independently.

Smartlead charges for lead data on its cheap tiers and gives it away on its expensive ones. The Verified Prospect Emails add-on is $59 a month on Base and Pro, and free on Unlimited Smart and Unlimited Prime. On annual billing that puts Pro plus the add-on at $137 a month against $144 for Unlimited Smart. Seven dollars a month, or $84 a year, is the entire gap between them, and Smart throws in unlimited contacts and 60,000 more sends.

Saru says: Every trap on this page is arithmetic that the vendor already published. Nobody hid anything. It just needed someone to do the subtraction.

The four that will not tell you

Quote-only is not automatically evasive, and the four here are not equally opaque.

Cognism gates the number and publishes the model better than most vendors who publish prices. It states that one credit equals one revealed contact, that viewing a contact you have already revealed costs nothing, that the same credits work across the prospecting platform, Enrich and the API at no extra charge, and that in Enrich a credit is spent again only when a key detail changes, such as a job move. That is genuinely useful, and it is more than Salesloft or ZoomInfo give you.

Outreach publishes its structure. It states that pricing combines seat-based and consumption-based charging powered by AI credits, so AI usage can scale without adding seats. Named packages, a feature matrix, and Request Pricing on all of them.

Salesloft publishes package names and what is in them, and nothing else. Across two passes the only pricing instruction on the page was to contact them.

ZoomInfo lists packages across sales, marketing, talent and data, each with a Get Pricing button. No figures, no model.

If you are on a call with any of the four, the question that saves the most money is not “what does it cost”. It is “what is the unit, and what makes it go up”.


The seven, tier by tier

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Five tiers on one product line, $25 to $550 per user per month, a twenty-twofold range. Starter Suite at $25 is the only one that can be billed monthly. Pro Suite is $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 and Agentforce 1 Sales $550, and every one of those four is annual commitment only. Salesforce also prints Revenue Cloud from $200 per user per month and Partner Relationship Management from $10 per login per month on the same page.

HubSpot Sales Hub

Free Tools at $0, Starter at $7 per seat per month annually, Professional at $90 and Enterprise at $150, as published on 13 August 2026. Starter billed monthly is $20 rather than $7, so paying month to month costs 186% more, a gap far outside the 10% to 20% normal here. Add the required onboarding fees above before comparing anything.

Apollo.io

Free at $0 with 75 credits per seat per month. Basic $49 annually or $65 monthly with 30,000 credits per seat per year granted upfront. Professional $79 or $99. Organization $119 or $149, annual only, three seats minimum. Two add-ons at $149 per team per month, Inbound and Advanced Dialer. See our Apollo.io pricing breakdown for what a credit actually buys.

Clay

Free at 500 actions and 100 data credits a month. Launch $167 a month, Growth $446, Enterprise on quote. Both paid tiers are two sliders you set independently, and the plan name does not change when you move either one. Full breakdown in our Clay pricing analysis.

Smartlead

Base $32 annually or $39 monthly. Pro $78 or $94. Unlimited Smart $144 or $174. Unlimited Prime $315 or $379. Contacts are capped at 2,000 and 30,000 on the two lower tiers and unlimited on the two upper ones. More in our Smartlead pricing analysis.

Instantly

Growth $47 a month for 5,000 emails and 1,000 contacts. Hypergrowth $97 for 25,000 contacts. Light Speed $358 for 500,000 emails and 100,000 contacts. Enterprise on quote. Bundles are sold separately from $94 a month. One caution covered in our Instantly pricing analysis: Instantly’s own page disagrees with itself about the Hypergrowth email allowance.

Lavender

Basic free, capped at five emails analysed and five personalised a month. Starter $27 annually or $29 monthly, Individual Pro $45 or $49, Teams $89 or $99 per seat. The annual discount is the smallest here at 6.9% to 10.1%. See our Lavender pricing analysis.


What to ask before you sign

What is the unit, in one word. Seats, credits, sends or revealed contacts. Everything else follows from it.

What is not in the number you just quoted me. Onboarding, implementation, data add-ons, dialer add-ons, and the minimum seat count.

What is the year two price, in writing. Every figure on this page is a year one figure.

What happens at the ceiling. Ask what the overage rate is and whether the allowance resets, rolls over or is granted upfront. Apollo grants a year of credits on day one; that is very different from twelve monthly grants if your work is seasonal.

Which of my numbers moves the bill. Then check whether that is the number your plan for next year says will grow.


Verdict

Seven of eleven publish a price, which is better than this category’s reputation suggests, and better than nonprofit CRM, where only one of six does. The problem is not secrecy, it is that the seven who publish are not measuring the same thing, so the tables that put them side by side are quietly wrong.

If you want the shortest honest summary: Smartlead and Instantly compete on cost per email and Smartlead is more transparent about billing, Apollo and Clay compete on cost per data operation and Clay is the more configurable and the more expensive, Salesforce and HubSpot compete on cost per person and both have real costs outside the headline, and Lavender is the only one here priced like a tool for one person rather than a platform for a team.

The four that quote on request are not all the same. Cognism tells you how its meter works in more detail than several vendors who print a price. Salesloft and ZoomInfo tell you nothing at all.

Every figure on this page was read from the vendor’s own page on 26 August 2026, HubSpot excepted and dated. Prices in this category move fast enough that we would not trust these numbers past the end of the year without re-reading them.

Faz - founder of AIToolsBakery

Written by

Faz

Faz is the founder of AIToolsBakery. Every tool on this site is personally tested with real-world writing tasks before a single word gets published. No sponsored rankings, no recycled press releases.

Read more about how we test →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which AI sales tools publish their pricing?
Why can you not compare AI sales tools in one price column?
What is the cheapest AI sales tool that publishes a price?
Which AI sales tool is cheapest per email sent?
What costs are not in the advertised price?
Do the advertised annual discounts hold up?
ShareLinkedIn
Faz
Faz
The Baker
Faz is the editor and founder of AI Tools Bakery, where every AI tool review is built on verified vendor pricing, documented user reports, and published product records. 10+ years in digital marketing, now covering AI software across 19 industries with honest verdicts and no pay-to-win rankings.
Scroll to Top