Quick answer: Yoodli is $0 for Starter, $8 a month for Pro and $20 for Advanced billed annually, or $11 and $28 billed monthly. Starter caps you at five roleplays total, Pro at ten a week with no rollover, Advanced is unlimited. Teams are quote only. Checked 12 August 2026.
How we researched this
We did not run Yoodli. This is a pricing analysis read directly from yoodli.ai on 12 August 2026, in a browser, with the billing control flipped both ways and the figures recorded in each state. It is not a hands-on review and we do not score the product.
Flipping the control matters, and it is fiddly on this page in a way worth describing. The individual plans are not on the pricing page as it first loads: you reach them through “See individual plans”, and the page then defaults to annual prices. Anything that reads the page once and moves on reports only the lower set of numbers. Both sets are below.
Every Yoodli tier and what it actually costs
| Tier | Billed annually | Billed monthly | Roleplay limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0 | $0 | 5 roleplays total, not per month |
| Pro | $8/mo | $11/mo | 10 roleplays per week, unused do not roll over |
| Advanced | $20/mo | $28/mo | Unlimited |
| Team and Enterprise | quote only | quote only | Not published |
Starter needs no credit card. Both paid individual tiers include live AI roleplays and feedback on uploaded recordings.
The limits are the real difference, not the features
Read the last column again, because the tiers are separated by volume rather than capability.
Starter’s five roleplays are a lifetime total, not a monthly allowance. It is a trial with no clock on it rather than a free plan you can keep using.
Pro’s ten per week do not roll over. If you practise in bursts before a big meeting rather than evenly across the month, that cap will bite in a way a monthly allowance would not. Forty or so sessions a month sounds generous until you need fifteen in one weekend.
Advanced is the only unlimited tier, and it carries the one privacy difference that matters: your data is excluded from AI training. That is a capability difference, not just a volume one, and it is worth knowing if you are rehearsing anything commercially sensitive.
The discount badge that does not match the prices
The billing control on Yoodli’s pricing page is badged “SAVE 40%”.
On Yoodli’s own published numbers, the annual saving is:
- Pro: $8 against $11, a saving of 27%
- Advanced: $20 against $28, a saving of 29%
Neither reaches 40%. We are reporting what the page showed on 12 August 2026 and not inferring intent. The badge may be legacy from an earlier price, or it may refer to a plan not shown. But if you are budgeting from that number, budget from 27 to 29 percent, not 40.
What the Team plan gets you, and what it costs
Team and Enterprise pricing is not published. What is published is the feature line: customisation around your own rubric, ICP and methodology, team dashboards, roleplay assignment, advanced user management, SSO, SCIM, data retention controls, and LMS, CMS and HRIS integrations. Yoodli states it is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and GDPR compliant.
The page also carries a claimed 95% enterprise retention figure and names Snowflake, Google Cloud and Harness as customers. Treat the retention number as a vendor claim. We have no way to verify it.
Yoodli is the only vendor in this category that publishes a price
We checked twelve platforms in the AI sales roleplay and coaching space on the same day. Hyperbound, Gong, Allego, Highspot, Quantified.ai, Revenue.io, Chorus, SmartWinnr and Zenarate are all quote only. Mindtickle and Balto do not have a pricing page at all.
Yoodli is the exception. Whatever else you think of the product, being able to read the number before you talk to anyone is worth something, and in this category it is rare. The full comparison is in our best AI sales coaching software guide, and the closest quote-only comparison is our Hyperbound pricing guide.
For what the product actually does, see our Yoodli review. Yoodli also ranks in our AI sales roleplay tools and best AI sales training software roundups.
Rolling this out so people actually use it
The failure mode in corporate training software is not a bad product, it is a deployment that reaches week six with impressive licence numbers and no behaviour change.
Pick one team and one behaviour, not one platform
The instinct is to roll out to everyone because the licence covers it. The better move is one team, one measurable behaviour, and a fixed period. A discovery call structure, an objection, a specific product pitch. Narrow scope means you can tell whether it worked, and a result from one team persuades the rest far more effectively than a mandate.
Managers have to use it before reps do
Roleplay and coaching platforms live or die on whether managers review the output. If a rep completes a scenario and nobody ever mentions it, completion becomes a compliance task within a fortnight. Before launch, agree which existing meeting will use the output, ideally the one-to-one that already happens, and make somebody responsible for opening it there.
Mandatory completion produces completion, not skill
If the only metric is completion percentage, you will get a high completion percentage and learn nothing. Pair it with something qualitative from the start: a manager rating on a rubric, a before-and-after recording, or a call outcome. Otherwise the dashboard will look excellent while the sales floor is unchanged.
Plan for the second wave, which is where it usually dies
The first cohort is volunteers and enthusiasts and it always goes well. The second is everyone else, and their experience decides whether yoodli pricing becomes part of how the team works. Budget real time for the second wave, expect more resistance, and do not read the first cohort’s enthusiasm as evidence the rollout is done.
Name the owner and the stop condition
One person whose job includes this, with the hours to do it, and a written statement of what twelve months would have to look like for you not to renew. Both are unglamorous and both are the difference between a platform that survives a budget review and one that quietly does not.
Measuring training, honestly
Training is the discipline most prone to measuring the wrong thing well. Four levels of rigour are available and most organisations stop at the first.
Reaction is easy and nearly worthless
Satisfaction scores at the end of a session tell you whether people enjoyed it, which correlates weakly with whether they can now do anything differently. Collect it if you like, and do not report it as evidence the training worked.
Completion is an activity metric
Completion percentage measures compliance with an instruction. It is genuinely necessary for regulated training, where the record is the point, and it is not evidence of capability anywhere else. Report it as what it is.
Behaviour change is where the real evidence starts
Pick one observable behaviour and measure it before and after: the proportion of discovery calls that reach a defined qualification step, the share of tickets resolved without escalation, the number of safety observations logged. It needs a baseline from before the training, which is why this gets skipped, and it is the first level that would survive a hostile question.
Business outcome, with the caveat stated out loud
Attributing revenue or incident rates to a training programme inside one year is genuinely hard, because everything else moved too. If you report an outcome, report what else changed in the same period. The most credible thing a training team can do is claim the behaviour change it can evidence and be openly cautious about the outcome it cannot.
Take the baseline in the week before launch
Whatever you choose, capture it before anything is switched on, from a source the project did not touch. It takes an hour and it is unrecoverable afterwards, which is the single reason most training investments can never be evaluated.
Why the price you see may not be the price we saw
This deserves its own section because it affects several tools in this category and almost no comparison article accounts for it.
What we actually observed
When we read Synthesia’s pricing page on 4 September 2026, every plan figure was in rupees, because our captures run from an Indian IP address and the site served local pricing automatically. HeyGen went further: a request to heygen.com/pricing redirected to its /en-in/ locale even when we sent a United States language header, meaning the routing is by IP rather than by browser preference.
Why this breaks most price comparisons
An article quoting a single global figure for a geo-priced tool is describing one country’s rate card and presenting it as the price. Regional pricing is not usually a straight currency conversion either; vendors set local rates deliberately, so the ratio between two markets can differ considerably from the exchange rate. That means you cannot fix the problem by converting, and we do not attempt to.
How to check your own number in thirty seconds
Open the vendor’s pricing page yourself, from the country where the contract will sit, and look at the currency symbol before you look at the number. If the URL contains a locale segment such as /en-in/ or /en-gb/, you are on a regional page. Where a vendor offers a currency selector, note that changing it sometimes changes the plan structure and not merely the symbol.
What to ask when the contract is cross-border
If your company is registered in one country and the team is in another, ask which entity is billed, in which currency, and whether the rate is fixed for the term or moves with a published exchange rate. Ask whether taxes are included, because several vendors here publish figures excluding tax. These questions are dull and they are the difference between a budget that holds and one that drifts by a fifth.
Where the figures on this page come from
Every price here was read from the vendor’s own pricing page on 4 September 2026 and carries that date. Where a page served us regional pricing we say so rather than converting it, because regional rates are set deliberately and are not a currency conversion.
The pages we read
Yoodli publishes $8 and $20 a month billed annually plus a free tier. Colossyan publishes a free plan and Professional at $59 a month annually with $30 per additional member. HeyGen publishes $0, $29, $49 and $149 a month with team seats at $20. iSpring publishes $970, $1,290 and $720 USD per author per year. Deputy publishes $5, $6.50 and $9 per user per month excluding tax. Synthesia served us rupee pricing, reported as such above.
The ones that publish no figure
Second Nature, Hyperbound, Mindtickle, Highspot and Visier all declined to show us a price, and Allego publishes a pricing page with no currency figure on it at all. Articulate publishes only a limited-time offer, currently $1,198 per user per year against a struck-through $1,749. Treat any other figure for those seven as unverified.
What we do not do
We do not convert currencies, and we do not carry a figure we cannot source to the vendor. Where a number circulates and cannot be traced, we say so and withdraw it rather than repeating it with a hedge.
What sales training and roleplay platforms actually charge
This is one of the least transparent categories we cover. Most vendors quote rather than publish, which changes how the evaluation has to be run. Here is each alternative to yoodli pricing, read at source on 4 September 2026.
Yoodli, the only one here with a published individual rate
Yoodli publishes $8 a month billed annually for its Pro individual plan, which includes up to ten roleplays a week and live AI coaching, and $20 a month billed annually above that. It also runs a free tier. That makes it the only platform in this comparison a single person can price without speaking to anyone, which matters if you want to test the category before committing a team budget.
The five that publish no figure at all
We could not read a price from Second Nature, Hyperbound, Mindtickle, Highspot or Visier on 4 September 2026. Hyperbound and Highspot both render a pricing page carrying no currency figure. That is a commercial choice rather than an oversight, and it is the norm at the enterprise end of sales enablement.
Allego publishes a pricing page with no price on it
Allego is worth calling out separately. It has a real pricing page, headed “Simple Sales Enablement Pricing. Clear Results.”, and there is not a single currency figure anywhere on it. It does publish something useful though: a contract buyout programme for customers switching from a competitor mid-term. If you are locked into a rival, that is worth asking about specifically, because it is the kind of term that rarely appears in a comparison table.
What to do when almost nobody publishes
Price a published alternative precisely at your seat count and make it the number every quote has to justify itself against. Yoodli at $20 a month billed annually across 40 reps is $9,600 a year. That is not a like-for-like substitute for an enterprise enablement platform, and it is a real figure in the room that both sides can verify, which is more than you will otherwise have.
Ask what the platform fee is separate from the seats
Several vendors in this category price as per-user licences plus a platform fee that scales with the number of users supported. That means the cost does not fall as neatly with a smaller pilot as you might expect, and a 10-seat pilot can carry most of the platform cost of a 50-seat deployment. Ask for both components separately before modelling a phased rollout.
Verdict
Yoodli’s individual pricing is clear, cheap and honestly presented apart from that one badge. Pick the tier on volume and privacy rather than features: Starter is a five session trial, Pro suits steady weekly practice, Advanced is for heavy use or anyone who needs their recordings kept out of model training. Teams have to make a call to find out anything.
Figures checked on yoodli.ai/pricing on 12 August 2026.
Written by
FazFaz is the founder of AIToolsBakery. Some tools here are tested hands on. Others are assessed from vendor documentation and pricing verified on the live page, and every review says which one it is. Sponsors can buy a position in a guide. They cannot buy the score, the criticism, or silence about a better option.
How we test and how we make money →Frequently Asked Questions
